Objective:
By the end of this lesson, you will learn about Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms and understand their advantages over traditional litigation. This knowledge will empower you to appreciate ADR’s role in resolving disputes efficiently and amicably, preparing you for mediation practice.
Role Play: A Dispute Between a Tenant and Landlord in Nairobi Over Unpaid Rent and Property Damage
To apply the concepts of this lesson, consider the following scenario:
Background: In Nairobi, a tenant, Amina, and her landlord, Mr. Kamau, are in conflict. Amina has not paid rent for three months, claiming Mr. Kamau failed to repair a leaking roof that damaged her furniture. Mr. Kamau insists Amina pay the full amount owed—KSH 90,000—before he addresses repairs, and he accuses her of causing additional property damage. The dispute is escalating, with Mr. Kamau threatening eviction and Amina considering legal action.
Parties Involved:
Task: As you work through this lesson, think about how ADR could resolve this dispute. Which mechanism might suit these parties? What are the benefits over going to court? We’ll revisit this at the end to apply your learning.
Course Content:
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to methods of resolving disputes outside traditional courtroom litigation. The 40-Hour Mediation Course Handbook provides several definitions:
Summary: ADR is a spectrum of flexible, non-adversarial processes that help parties reach agreements with the assistance of a neutral third party, avoiding the delays and costs of litigation.
Reflection Question: How might ADR benefit Amina and Mr. Kamau compared to a courtroom battle?
ADR mechanisms vary in approach, from consensual to adjudicative. Here are the common types outlined in the handbook:
Visual Aid (ADR Spectrum): Imagine a line from “Consensual” (negotiation, mediation) to “Adjudicative” (arbitration), showing how control shifts from parties to a third party as you move along.
Key Insight: Each type suits different disputes—negotiation for simple issues, mediation for relationship preservation, and arbitration for decisive outcomes.
Reflection Question: Which ADR type seems most appropriate for Amina and Mr. Kamau’s dispute? Why?
ADR offers distinct benefits over litigation, but it’s not without drawbacks. Here’s a breakdown from the handbook:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Table : Advantages and Disadvantages of ADR
Aspect | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Speed | Quick resolution | May rush complex issues |
Cost | Affordable | Initial mediator fees |
Confidentiality | Private proceedings | Limited public accountability |
Outcome | Party-driven solutions | Non-binding without formalization |
Reflection Question: What advantage of ADR might appeal most to Amina? To Mr. Kamau?
ADR in Kenya is supported by a robust legal structure:
Key Insight: This framework ensures ADR is standardized and legally recognized, boosting its credibility and use in Kenya.
Reflection Question: How does Kenya’s legal support for ADR reassure Amina and Mr. Kamau about using mediation?
Applying the Lesson to the Role Play
Let’s revisit Amina and Mr. Kamau’s dispute:
Your Role as Mediator: You’d facilitate a discussion where Amina pays a reduced rent while Mr. Kamau fixes the roof, formalizing the agreement for enforceability under Kenyan law.